
I think most people know Bamboo as a great renewable, eco-friendly building material. It grows fast, has nice strong fibers, it is lightweight, easy to harvest, the list goes on.... Plus, it looks good.
Bamboo doesn't grow where I live, not even possible - so we use logs. Comparing Bamboo to Lodgepole Pine is a bit like apples to oranges, but I would like to see them co-exist in a building as much as possible. I believe the two materials can work well together. Unfortunately, there are few climates where they both grow side by side, so creating a building of locally harvested materials is difficult.
Bamboo is the fastest growing plant in the world. It comes in several varieties, and they aren't all suitable for building. There are places where Bamboo grows up to four feet per day - that's amazing! On average, Bamboo can be harvested as a building material every seven years and will produce twenty times more material per acre than hardwoods. I like it.
I believe we can save a lot of energy if we use materials that require less processing. For example, plywood (or OSB) can be made from just about any kind of wood. Simply mix your wood chips with a bunch of formaldehyde and run it through the press and you have a nice, flat, sheet of wood to work with - after a lot of processing. There seems to always be an alternative to using materials that were manufactured or "processed" like this - you just have to look around. Also, these materials that make life easier, will shorten your life - and the lives of others. OSB (oriented strand board) is found in nearly every house in America. 3 ingredients: Wood (the dust of which is a known carcinogen), Formaldehyde (may cause reproductive harm and cancer, indoor air pollutant), Paraffin Wax (basically turns your house into a huge match, extremely flammable).
Another one I'm not so keen on are SIP's. A panel made from OSB and Styrofoam. Yes, it will give you some energy-tax credit, but it sure won't make the air in your house better. There will be more on this later...
I have been seeing a lot of claims to "Green Building" on the Internet. It happens locally too, with contractors advertising as a "Green Builder". OK, this is a HUGE topic that I will only make a few points about.
How are people saying a building is "Green" when it is made from manufactured materials? Just because you put it together in a shop and hauled it to the job site and bolted it together in 10 hours doesn't make it better for the environment. You know who you are. I think people are using this term a little too loosely. Does Green Building = Natural materials? Well, no it doesn't but should it? Obviously, this term is interpreted in many ways. By most definitions a "Green Building" must avoid environmental degradation by using renewable resources. Green Building means using less energy, keeping building occupants healthy, and having less impact on the earth.
Natural Building is a philosophy I like a lot too. Build a structure using materials that can be recycled, composted, or used as fuel. Combine this with Green Building practices, build things stronger than they need to be, think about the future, life is good...